Embattled housing minister Robert Jenrick has admitted that he intentionally aided a Tory donor keep away from paying a new tax on his housing advancement, and that this was the correct point to do.

Mr Jenrick was criticised for approving Richard Desmond’s luxury housing scheme a day ahead of a local community infrastructure levy arrived in to drive, potentially conserving the magnate £45 million in levies.

But talking at a parliamentary committee on Wednesday the minister, who is continue to in publish, advised MPs that he was performing in accordance with “pure justice” by finding the scheme as a result of ahead of the costs would have utilized.

He observed that the developer had reported the scheme may well not be viable if he had had to shell out the tax, which would have gone to fund general public products and services in Tower Hamlets, just one of the country’s most deprived parts.

“The advice was very very clear: it was consistent with our coverage and previous choices … which show that it is a materials and reputable choice to try if just one can to make a choice in advance of a content transform in circumstance may well take place,” Mr Jenrick told the housing and communities committee.

“The inspectors’ report also produced the position that the viability of the venture might be compromised were being the CIL [community infrastructure levy] to come in and clearly the developer in the submission to the arranging inspectorate built the submission to the organizing inspectorate designed that issue as properly.

“So I think it was completely reasonable final decision to see if we could, with a comprehensive choice-earning procedure, make the final decision a person way or a further in time to be communicated right before that alter in conditions.”

Mr Desmond experienced despatched Mr Jenrick messages forward of the approval telling him that “we value the speed as we never want to give Marxists loads of doe [sic] for almost nothing!”, referring to the nearby council.

Pushed on the difficulty, the minister explained to MPs: “What that added benefits is of no desire to me, I am not fascinated in the own funds of the applicant. I’m intrigued in earning a good selection on the foundation of the fact in advance of a materials transform in circumstances happens. That is the rule of legislation, that’s natural justice, that is the purpose of the secretary of point out.”

Downing Street claims the prime minister has comprehensive self esteem in Mr Jenrick.

Speaking at the exact same committee, the minister defended get hold of he had had with the Tory donor ahead of building the final decision.

“There was no bias in any respect and any recommendation of that is I think extremely unfair and in most instances a wilful misreading of occasions. But would it be greater to not have been sat upcoming to the applicant? Certainly. That wasn’t my selection. Would it have been superior not to have experienced textual content messages with him? Indeed. And both of those myself and the division will master classes from the working experience.”

He argued that he had authorized the advancement at Westferry on the Isle of Puppies in east London to try and tackle the housing disaster, telling MPs: “If you search at the other choices that I’ve created as secretary of point out in my time, whilst each and every 1 is designed on unique merits of the specific circumstance it is quite clear that I’ve taken conclusions to get housing crafted and build the properties this state needs. That is what a housing secretary in a housing disaster needs to do.“

Mr Jenrick also mentioned: “I feel that there is a generational obstacle throughout the nation and in individual in London – households of all kinds and tenures, including affordable homes – and if we are heading to do that then it is right that we prioritise brownfield sites, and if we’re going to create upwards then it is right to prioritise components of the funds and the region the place there are present clusters of large-rise structures. So on the deserves of this distinct software it seemed to me just after a extensive final decision making method that it was correct to approve it.”

A lot more follows…