Elon Musk supplied Amber Read “24/7 security” soon after she explained to him she desired a restraining get from Johnny Depp, the Large Court docket has heard.

She denied Mr Musk frequented her even though her then-partner Mr Depp was absent.

Mr Depp, 57, is suing the publisher of the Solar over an report that labelled him a “spouse beater” – but the newspaper insists it was precise.

The US actress, 34, was providing proof in London for a next working day on the 11th day of her ex-husband’s libel motion.

She dismissed suggestions Mr Musk frequented her in 2015 even though Mr Depp was away, expressing she was not in touch with the Tesla founder until eventually the following year.

On Tuesday, Mr Depp’s lawyer, Eleanor Legislation QC, questioned Ms Heard on her assertion, in which the law firm mentioned the actress had indicated that Mr Depp was “illogically jealous” and that she wasn’t getting any “illicit associations”.

The demo judge, Mr Justice Nicol, intervened to say the phrase “illicit… carries a connotation”.

Ms Heard replied: “Not that that issues a lot, but no.”

Ms Laws agreed: “No, it doesn’t.”

The lawyer then go through out text messages among Ms Listened to and Mr Musk from 22 May perhaps 2016, in which Ms Listened to explained to Mr Musk that she was likely to receive a restraining purchase from her then spouse.

The messages arrived a day immediately after an alleged incident at the Japanese Columbia Building in Los Angeles, where Mr Depp and Ms Listened to lived, in which the actress promises Mr Depp threw her cellular cell phone at her, hitting her in the confront – which the actor denies.

Questioning Ms Read, Ms Laws mentioned Mr Musk offered to “arrange 24/7 safety for you”, introducing that he mentioned: “The offer you would stand, even if you in no way wanted to see me all over again… in any case, sorry for becoming an idiot. The radio silence hurts a lot. It only matters due to the fact I definitely like you.”

The barrister then referred to evidence supplied by Alejandro Romero, a concierge at the Japanese Columbia Developing, who stated he observed Mr Musk viewing Ms Read “when Mr Depp was in Australia”.

Ms Heard claimed Mr Romero was “erroneous”, insisting that she wasn’t in conversation with Mr Musk till 2016.

In his prepared witness statement, Mr Romero stated: “From March 2015 onwards, Ms Listened to was visited often late at night time, at all-around 11pm to midnight, by Mr Elon Musk.”

The concierge claimed Ms Listened to gave Mr Musk his own fob to obtain the developing.

Ms Heard has said that Mr Depp accused her of possessing affairs with fellow actors, such as James Franco – with whom she starred in the film The Adderall Diaries.

Mr Depp’s lawyer asked Ms Listened to about Mr Franco and her remark in her assertion that he was “someone that Mr Depp was accusing you of possessing an affair with and he was quite wrong about it”.

Ms Heard said: “That is suitable.”

The lawyer confirmed the court CCTV footage of the actress travelling downstairs in the raise at the Eastern Columbia Creating on 22 May 22 2016 at all-around 23:00 regional time (06:00 BST), before travelling back upstairs shortly right after with Mr Franco.

After Ms Listened to verified that the gentleman in the footage was Mr Franco, Ms Regulations asked her if she was attempting to “stay away from” currently being observed by the digital camera.

Ms Listened to replied that the pair ended up “speaking” and Mr Franco was expressing to her “‘oh my god, what occurred to you?’ when he saw her face.

Ms Heard mentioned she gathered Mr Franco from downstairs soon after 23:00 neighborhood time, before adding that “in individuals days, I did not slumber a great deal at night”.

Mattress defecation ‘absolutely disgusting’

Ms Regulations turned to an alleged incident in which Mr Depp’s cleaner was reported to have uncovered faeces in his mattress the morning following Ms Heard’s 30th birthday bash at the Eastern Columbia Constructing.

Mr Depp has earlier explained it was “a mystery” who defecated in the bed “and it was not remaining by a three or 4-pound dog”, in reference to the couple’s pets, one particular of which was stated to have “issues with her toilet behaviors”.

He said he was “convinced” that Ms Listened to or “a person of her cohort” had remaining the excrement on the mattress.

Ms Heard denied that she or any of her mates remaining “human excrement” on the mattress when challenged by Ms Legislation, contacting such an act “unquestionably disgusting”.

Asked about the couple’s dog’s problems with bathroom instruction, Ms Heard said it experienced turn into a “popular occurrence” just after one of the dogs ate some of Mr Depp’s cannabis as a pup.

She stated Mr Depp’s housekeeper Hilda Vargas would clear up after the canines “occasionally” but that when her ex-husband’s pet dog would have accidents in the bed “both in some cases on Johnny…or not” she would thoroughly clean it up.

Ms Laws reported Ms Vargas “knew the difference” concerning the mess the couples’ puppies manufactured and human faeces, and requested Ms Listened to if Ms Vargas was wrong.

Ms Read explained she didn’t know what Ms Vargas was mistaken about, but that she couldn’t “fathom what adult would at any time do these a point”.

She claimed: “I are unable to visualize what form of human remaining would have a sense of humour like that, other than Johnny, but I really don’t believe that is amusing, I believe it truly is horrific.”

The libel case centres on an article printed on the Sun’s web page in April 2018 headlined: “Gone Potty: How can JK Rowling be ‘genuinely happy’ casting wife beater Johnny Depp in the new Amazing Beasts movie?”.

The report related to allegations produced by Ms Read, which Mr Depp denies.

Her proof was in the beginning because of to conclude on Wednesday but will now proceed right until Thursday early morning, with her buddies Melanie Inglessis and Joshua Drew predicted to look by videolink on Wednesday afternoon.